<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Am A CISSP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/</link>
	<description>Much ado about Nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:31:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patti</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-172</guid>
		<description>The relevant standard is:  DoD 8570.01-M &quot;Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program&quot;.  It&#039;s purpose is to &quot;Establish baseline technical and management IA skills among personnel performing IA functions across the DoD enterprise&quot;.

The short of it is that in order to work on DoD projects in an IA capacity beyond December 31st, 2008, you have to hold certain certifications.  The &quot;chart&quot; is on Page 92 of the Standard PDF:  http://www.js.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/857001m.pdf .

A Security+ gets you on the chart; that&#039;s a good thing.  An Associate (if you don&#039;t have the years for the CISSP) gets you to higher levels within the chart; that&#039;s a better thing.  But four years and a Security+ should be enough experience for your CISSP, if you pass the exam.  Take a look at the requirements on the ISC2 website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relevant standard is:  DoD 8570.01-M &#8220;Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program&#8221;.  It&#8217;s purpose is to &#8220;Establish baseline technical and management IA skills among personnel performing IA functions across the DoD enterprise&#8221;.</p>
<p>The short of it is that in order to work on DoD projects in an IA capacity beyond December 31st, 2008, you have to hold certain certifications.  The &#8220;chart&#8221; is on Page 92 of the Standard PDF:  <a href="http://www.js.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/857001m.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.js.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/857001m.pdf</a> .</p>
<p>A Security+ gets you on the chart; that&#8217;s a good thing.  An Associate (if you don&#8217;t have the years for the CISSP) gets you to higher levels within the chart; that&#8217;s a better thing.  But four years and a Security+ should be enough experience for your CISSP, if you pass the exam.  Take a look at the requirements on the ISC2 website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiousg</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I have a 4 year, unfortunately in history.  I don&#039;t know if that will count.

What are the DOD requirements chart taking effect in Jan 1 2009?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 4 year, unfortunately in history.  I don&#8217;t know if that will count.</p>
<p>What are the DOD requirements chart taking effect in Jan 1 2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Congrats . . . now you started your addiction. . . . gotta get the rest of the IA certifications . . .  ISSEP, CISM . . . good thing is that you can use your study time as CPE now.

once again congrats!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats . . . now you started your addiction. . . . gotta get the rest of the IA certifications . . .  ISSEP, CISM . . . good thing is that you can use your study time as CPE now.</p>
<p>once again congrats!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patti</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-169</guid>
		<description>My company probably won&#039;t give me an out-of-cycle pay raise for becoming a CISSP, so it will be next year before I know if CISSP translates to $$ for me, personally.  In my case, I went for the CISSP for two reasons:  1) justify my continued existence, since I haven&#039;t yet completed my college degree (I&#039;m part-timing it), and 2) get me on the DoD requirements chart that takes effect January 1, 2009.

In order to be a CISSP, you have to show either five years of direct work experience, or four years + a college degree.  It looks like you can also go for it with four years + a Security+ certification.  (https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?page=1016)  If you don&#039;t have the required years of experience, you can still take the exam and become an Associate until you do have the required years of experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company probably won&#8217;t give me an out-of-cycle pay raise for becoming a CISSP, so it will be next year before I know if CISSP translates to $$ for me, personally.  In my case, I went for the CISSP for two reasons:  1) justify my continued existence, since I haven&#8217;t yet completed my college degree (I&#8217;m part-timing it), and 2) get me on the DoD requirements chart that takes effect January 1, 2009.</p>
<p>In order to be a CISSP, you have to show either five years of direct work experience, or four years + a college degree.  It looks like you can also go for it with four years + a Security+ certification.  (<a href="https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?page=1016" rel="nofollow">https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?page=1016</a>)  If you don&#8217;t have the required years of experience, you can still take the exam and become an Associate until you do have the required years of experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiousg</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Also, do you have to have 5 years of experience before you can take that exam?  Or is it three?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, do you have to have 5 years of experience before you can take that exam?  Or is it three?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiousg</title>
		<link>http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/2008/07/27/i-am-a-cissp/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nothingnoteworthy.com/?p=221#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I am curious if your new title has won you more money?  I have completed my security+ cert (yes, I know not nearly as famous and fancy).  I am wondering if it is worth my time to study for the cert.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am curious if your new title has won you more money?  I have completed my security+ cert (yes, I know not nearly as famous and fancy).  I am wondering if it is worth my time to study for the cert.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

